Seb Palmer

Next I’ll need to start working on the doors and windows…

As mentioned in a previous recent post, I’m rebuilding a better roof, for my 1:30 art studio model. This time it’ll only have four, not five A-frames.

I also did some work on the walls, to make them cleaner, flatter, more in square. So the roof will be sitting on a stabler base.

Below, a gallery of images showing work in progress. The horizontal members – only on the two inner frames, are suggestive of a potential internal roof. Or do I leave the roof space open? I tend towards the latter.

Amazingly (or not?) this second attempt failed, yet again. So I had to find the problem and fix it. I made some spacing doodads, and did just that. It took ages, measuring, moving, checking and re-checking.

Eventually I got everything relatively well aligned, and deduced that one particular A-frame was sending everything out of whack. A bit of trimming, of said A-frame, finally got me – I hope – where I needed to be.

I’ve only kind of ‘tack-welded’ along the top of the roof, for now. I’ll let that dry. And then I’ll fix the lower ends of the roof sheets to the lower ends of the A-frame joists, along their bottom edges.

Hopefully the whole roof will be much better aligned, more ‘square’ to itself. And I can glue it all up, and then trim the roof panel sheets as needed. We shall see!

One thing this has thrown up is the way long overhanging eaves will overshadow some of the windows. Particularly those along the upper rear (south facing) fence side.

What do I do about this? Shorten the overhang of the eaves? Make the windows deeper? Situate the windows slightly lower down the wall?

Hmmm? It’s for such problem finding and solving issues a preparatory model is such a good idea. In addition to the sheer fun of building!

Today we visited the Cambridge University Botanic Gardens. An amazing place. It was ‘Apple Day’.

The red-tinged Acer near one of the rock gardens, above, is a real zinger.

It was very busy. And due to the aforementioned Apple Day, there was a kind of festival going on. But I’ve chosen to occlude that from view in my post!

The fountain looks very 1950s-60s. But it was in fact completed in 1970.

Dad very kindly treated us all to a fab lunch. The prices/cost… ??? Truly unbelievable! Thank goodness it was very delicious.

After lunch we toddled off on a circuitous route back to the entrance/exit, and the car. The very postwar brutalist building is in fact a much more recent addition than it looks.

Dad was riding around on a motability scooter, provided free, by the Gardens. He frequently zipped off on his own.

There are a great many very characterful trees. And what splendid individuals they are.

On the final leg of the walk there are numerous points of interest. Including a new viewing structure, with a long curved disabled access ramp.5

The largest of the ponds is near the old central axis. At this juncture I disappeared into the undergrowth for a spell. Magical!

As I left this area, I passed through several clumps of bamboo.

And finally…

We had a quick peek in the shop. Lots of lovely (overpriced) stuff. One area we didn’t look at, on this visit, were the glass-houses. We’ll have to come back another time and do them.

I did two shifts delivering out of Wisbech Mozzer’s today. Took the opportunity to pop home. Picked up model-making materials, had a little kiss n’ cuddle with Chester (too cute!), and… saw this behemoth!

What a terrific bit of old footage. Love Lizzy. And love this performance of one of their funkier classics.

As we’re currently at dad’s, I don’t at present have any materials to do more building work on this project. But I’m working two shifts out of Wisbech today, so I might collect some stuff from home whilst I’m nearby.

So all I’ve been able to do, whilst here at dad’s, is finish the cladding, and do a few coats of paint. I’d love to do the doors and windows. But I need some form of clear plastic (Perspex, or poss’ even real glass?) to do so.

Great fun!

These old Basil Rathbone Holmes movies were often on TV when I were a young nipper. Both Teresa and I ultimately prefer Jeremy Brett for the role, for a more authentic dramatic rendering of Holmes.

But Rathbone is great fun in these slightly odd wartime Yankee Doodle versions. And Nigel Bruce, as the bumbling Dr Watson, whilst silly, is very endearing.

I’ve seen this instalment of the series many times. And yet, watching it again, tonight, a lot of it I didn’t really recognise. Weird!

John Carradine a Eily Malyon are great as the spooky Mr & Mrs Barryman, servants at the Baskerville Pile.

This film isn’t very much like ACD’s written version. But who cares? There are other interpretations, if you want a more faithful rendering.

Fistful was my choice. The Hound was Teresa’s. And ultimately, they’re both a load of ol’ hokum. But enjoyably so.

Watching this, over at dad’s. What a classic! The weird disembodied voices, the result of dubbing, are annoying. But they’re almost part of the period charm.

Certainly the visual aesthetic (which, like the story itself, owes a debt to Kurosawa’s Yojimbo), and the fabulous music of Ennio Morricone, are wonderful.

Clint Eastwood’s Joe is a wonderfully appealing male-fantasy (appealing to men, undoubtedly; to women? I couldn’t say!): tough, taciturn, bright, witty, moralising, but a cold-hearted butcher, and a one man army.

What man doesn’t, secretly or otherwise, wish they were tough enough to take on all their enemies, and laconically and lethally dispatch them all? And get the girl(s), of course.

And Clint looks sooo goddam cool!

I want that poncho! But of course my pot-belly and haggard face won’t light it up like a young Eastwood does, alas.

The plot? Who cares, frankly. It’s just a pathetic McGuffin, giving Eastwood a vehicle do righteous murderous mayhem.

One thing I do like, plot wise, in addition to the whole general vibe, is the segment where the Rojos rough Joe up. Even though it doesn’t really tether our taciturn hero to reality, it does at least temper the whole ‘superhero’ level of invincibility.

There are some great faces in this movie. Eastwood, of course. Ramón and Esteban. A d then the old-timers, like Silvanito and Piripero.

For its time, 1964, the pornographic revelling in brutal violence must’ve been quite shocking. We’re inured to it now. But it’s pre Peckinpah, pre Tarantino. And it predates even the slew of 1970s ‘revisionist’ Westerns.

Anyway, this ain’t an in depth analysis. It’s just a wee celebration of a rather stylised and enjoyable slice of Spaghetti Western hokum.

I think I’ve got the trilogy on DVD, at home? I’ll have to watch the other two movies. And I’ll have to check out Yojimbo (again?), as well.

And the ending? S’wonderful.

We’re going to dad-sit for a few days: today (Thursday) through to Sunday. I’m taking several books, and my model in progress of our art studio

I’ve clad all the internal walls. And I’ve also done three of the external walls. I think I’ll rebuild the roof. As the one I’ve done just isn’t up to snuff!

And then it’ll be time to do the doors and windows. Phew!

Some time later…

At Dad’s, I finished cladding the ‘art studio’ model. After which we had pasta ready meals, with Pops (Sam joined us, but had already eaten), and watched some Colin Furze, followed by 12 Monkeys. I then gave the model an undercoat of off-white. And painted the exterior in Green Curry, a B&Q Valspar colour.

I’ve tried to edit Wikipedia entries before. But for reasons I now forget, I’ve never succeeded. Until today. I had to register anew. Bit of a pain. But once done, I created my first contribution to Wikipedia. Of which I’m very proud, and pleased as Punch!*

What exactly is it? I hear nobody ask me… well, it’s the addition of the 2022 book, listed below, in the bibliography section of Wikipedia’s entry on Marcus Hugh Tristram de la Poer Beresford, 7th Baron Decies, an Anglo-Irish hereditary peer.

Why? Because I’ve just read – and will shortly be reviewing – de la Poer Beresford’s very good book, Peninsular and Waterloo General: Sir Denis Pack and the War Against Napoleon.

With the author sharing the Beresford surname with one of Pack’s fellow Napoleonic-era generals, I decided I’d check if they were related. They are. And it turns out Marcus’ previous Napoleonic history book was all about his illustrious ancestor:

It also transpired that the bibliography on the Wiki page wasn’t up to date. Berefords’s Denis Pack book wasn’t listed. So I fixed that.

I’ve never really been that interested in the Commedia del’Arte (my pal Tim is!). Until now. Why so? Well, it turns out our Punch, of Punch n’ Judy fame, is a bastardised descendent of the Commedia character Polichinello (also sometimes spelled Polichinelle).

Anyway, I hope that now I can start contributing more to Wikipedia. We shall see, I suppose?